TARGET FOR ASSASSINATION: ROLL’S DOCKET 

Judge John Roll, at the time of his assassination was presiding over hundreds of cases. These cases ranged from a blacked-out EPA toxic waste class-action lawsuit to pedophilia. The media, at the time of his murder, suppressed discussing the big cases he was presiding over. Alex Jones and his gang only focused on Roll’s 1997 Brady Bill ruling against the Clinton administration and insisted that Roll was murdered because of gun control. This was certainly a big factor considering the media war that followed the 2011 Tucson Safeway shooting was focused on gun-control and mental health agenda. However, the operation cover-up was to solely blame a 22 year-old young man, who randomly went on a shooting rampage for his death.  

However, I was not buying the lies and rhetoric because I could see the investigation unfolding and even Sheriff Clarence Dupnik was lying to the nation. This is why I went to Tucson and had my own 10 days of investigation. The lie needed to be kept so tight, they had already predicted I would come and ask questions. In a later section, I will tell you what happened in Tucson and how I was set-up, threatened, and nearly escaped death over the evidence I had accumulated. Evidence that would prove the story of the Tucson shooting was a lie and Jared Lee Loughner is a patsy. 

Gun Control & Mental Health

The Brady Bill – this was a case that was no longer an active case on the docket at the time of Roll’s murder. Immediately following the shooting, the media began a political war over guns and mental illness. However, because Judge John Roll ruled against the Clinton Administration regarding the Brady Bill it is important to re-visit this case. 

Printz v. United States: 1997; Judge John Roll’s ruling in the case:

“The Court finds that in enacting (the Brady Bill) Congress exceeded its authority under Article 1, section 8 of the United States Constitution, thereby impermissively encroaching upon the powers retained by the states pursuant to the Tenth Amendment. The Court further finds that the provision, in conjunction with the criminal sanctions its violation would engender, is unconstitutionally vague under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.” 

Key Point – Judge John Roll stood in the way of the rising gun control agenda at the time Clinton was in office. After the Tucson and Sandy Hook shooting took place, a rise of tyrannical gun-control legislation was suddenly introduced. After the shooting and recovery of former Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, the gun control debates were all the media could focus on. I agree the shooting was a staged planned event, under the Obama administration, with specific agendas attached. Giffords and Mark Kelly appeared in every shooting demanding more gun-control: the banning of weapons, ammunition, and accessories as well as more demands for universal background checks. I found it interesting that before Gabrielle Giffords was shot, she was for the Second Amendment. However, after the shooting, she started a Giffords Law Center To Prevent Gun Violence and now demands more gun control attached to mental health agenda. Her husband, Mark Kelly is now running for Senate in 2020. 

Right after the shooting, a loud but passive cry was heard all over the mainstream media calling for more mental health money and more gun control. The justification was that the nation needed to be saved from all the crazy undiagnosed Jared Lee Loughners’ that ‘might’ go on a shooting rampage. Then, under the same Obama administration, the Sandy Hook shooting occurred and the cries became louder and the media’s paid puppets demanded more gun control, more mental health money, and universal background checks. The script was all the same… 

An article surfaced titled, Jared Loughner and Mental Illness: The Devastating Effects of Budget Cuts that Slash Care to the Mentally Ill. This article was written as a ‘ghost article’ that was read and referenced and then deleted off the internet and archives. It turned out to be a clue as to what the agenda was behind this operation. You guessed it, more mental health and gun control. OPERATION SAFEWAY. The push for more mental health, more pharma money, and more control. In a later section, I will discuss how the Tucson shooting set a precedence to forcibly medicate prisoners, as they did to Loughner while he was in the Springfield, Mo prison awaiting trial, under the care of a CIA doctor. 

EPA & Hazard Waste in Tucson

Case of Interest #2 – According to Investigative Journalist Lee Bracker, RIP, who helped on this investigation, and was the Editor and founder of the Saturday News Club in Tucson. He writes in a newsletter: 

“Judge John Roll was in charge of an EPA litigation case against all the industries that polluted the water supply of Tucson, Arizona and surrounding areas for over 6 years. This case, if not blacked out of the media, could very well be the biggest class action lawsuit ever recorded in history.” Allegedly, over 300 big named companies are attached to the lawsuit. “As it is, the case will either quash, or companies will pay out the chump change in order to seal the case with a lock and key.”

Just shy of two months prior to the murder of Judge John Roll, a news release by the Arizona Attorney’s General’s Office and Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality titled, 23 Companies to Pay Total of $542,000 to Resolve Hazardous Waste Dump Claims in Tucson’s Pantano Wash From 1945 until Early 1970s, released information about the companies responsible for the EPA’s waste-dump cover-up.

Whistle-blower, Ernest ‘Joe’ Blankinship, 81, RIP, was a Tucson resident and retired salvager. He testified to state and federal investigators in 2009 and again in 2011 that he disposed of ‘spent solvents’ from dozens of companies for decades in landfills along the Pantano Wash. This area is located six miles east of downtown Tucson. Blankenship claims the toxic dumping started just after the end of WWII until the early 1970’s.

On my investigation in Tucson, I arranged to speak with Mr. Blankinship and get his personal testimony. He agreed to meet with me and I spoke to him in great length about the EPA case. Blankinship started our interview out by letting me know that earlier in the day he had been threatened by an unknown person from the city when he was heading into a meeting. He said, “that individual who threatened me specifically told me  “just don’t talk about the city” and then grabbed my walking stick from me. Blankinship informed me that this was not the first time he had been threatened.

Oddly enough, while in the middle of the interview, he received a call from the FBI. He kept saying, “I’m not, I’m not!” After the call, he told me it was the FBI but refused to elaborate on what was said to him. I could tell that he was frightened. (Photo, 2011, Joe Blankinship, EPA whistle-blower).

He claimed his testimony in court had come at a heavy price. He told me his brother had been beaten to death and their ranch had been burned down. He would not tell me at the time the companies involved in the case, but he did tell me there were over 300 listed. 

Later, I discovered some of the companies listed in the lawsuit settling were General Dynamics Corp., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co, Lockheed Martin Corp., Tucson Dodge Inc., Textron Inc./ABB Inc./Combustion Engineering, Inc., R.E. Darling Co. Inc., Holmes Tuttle Ford, Inc., Pima County Community College, and Texas Instruments Inc. 

Following the shooting, the Navy dedicated an entirely new line of LCS Littoral Warships on behalf of Gabrielle Giffords. General Dynamics was awarded the contract. Pima County Community is the College Loughner attended, and Good Year Tires is the company that purchased Gabrielle Giffords father, Spencer Giffords tire company. This is a startling revelation because Gabrielle Giffords was the CEO & President of El-Campo Tire Warehouses, which sold to Good-Year in 2000. The time in question of the toxic waste dumping was from 1945-70’s. At that time, Giffords father would have been the owner. Would Giffords have been called to testify on the waste-dumping? 

Blankinship also claimed that the Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, located in Tucson, home of the Boneyard is one of the biggest polluters, as well as the Tucson Airport. 

Joe refused to speak about the corruption in the city for fear that they would come back and threaten him but he did suggest that Sheriff Clarence Dupnik has refused to investigate claims of corruption the entire time he has been in office. “He has put a lot of people in prison. The New Yorker even tried to expose the corruption at one time and it resulted in people being fired. They are selling bridges, highways, infrastructure, etc., and nothing is getting fixed.” Blankinship claims.

The ‘New Yorker’ statement Blankinship was referring to was an article titled, The Hanging Prosecutor: Annals of Law Killer Instincts, that was written by Jeffery Toobin and published in a January 2005 Edition of The New Yorker Magazine. The article refers to corruption in the Tucson prosecutor’s office naming Kenneth Peasley and Joe Godoy, who was a detective that arrived at the scene of 1992 triple murder at the El Grande Market place. It is worth the read. One interesting point in the article is the amount of corruption and the deep mafia roots in Tucson. As the New Yorker article revealed that Bruce Babbitt, a former governor of the State expressed, “There’s always a dark side to Tucson, too. The mob was a significant presence for years, with the Bonnano Family living there. The drug trade, with the proximity to the Mexican border, has always been a problem.” 

Blankinship continued: 

“Government, including law enforcement, dominated Tucson in the way that business, notably real-estate development controls Phoenix. The town went bankrupt and the mafia came in, bought everything up, and has been the corruption king city every since. Elections have been rigged and billions of dollars have been stolen under the Forfeiture Seizure Act and the money has been stolen from the gasoline tax.”

There was a GAG order on this case and when I asked Blankinship if he thought the judge could have been assassinated because of this case, he said, “it wouldn’t be the first time.” He did not want to elaborate any further on the topic. He also warned me, “be careful because anyone that has ever investigated the corruption in Tucson has come up dead.”

Illegal Immigration & Civil Rights Lawsuit

Case of Interest #3 – Vicente v. Barnett

In February, U.S. District Judge John Roll presided over a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit filed by illegal immigrants against an Arizona rancher. Roll ruled the case could go forward. Roll was at the heart of the state’s long political battle over immigration. In essence, he was in the cross hairs of the immigration foes. Judge Roll received hundred of threats after he allowed 16 undocumented Mexican immigrants to go forward with the $32 Million lawsuit against Rancher, Roger Barnett, who is also known as “one of the most prominent vigilantes” in the southwest. 

According to various sources, the Barnett case had repercussions for Roll and his family. His life was in danger and the political climate was heating up. There was outrage over the Civil Rights lawsuit. In the 2009 case, immigrants accused Barnett of violating their civil rights and falsely imprisoned them when they tried to cross the US-Mexico border near Douglas, AZ in 2004. 

The Plaintiffs were represented by the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), which was asking for $32 million in actual and punitive damages for civil rights violations, infliction of emotional distress, as well as other crimes. Some saw Barnett as a ‘hero’ who fought to protect his property by aiding in the apprehension of thousands of illegal aliens. Some, viewed him as a vigilante who often end up violating individuals’ civil rights.

According to the Washington Times, 

“The lawsuit is based on a March 7, 2004, incident in a dry wash on the 22,000-acre ranch, when he approached a group of illegal immigrants while carrying a gun and accompanied by a large dog. Attorneys for the immigrants – five women and 11 men who were trying to cross illegally into the United States – have accused Mr. Barnett of holding the group captive at gunpoint, threatening to turn his dog loose on them and saying he would shoot anyone who tried to escape.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center noted that, in 2006, “border vigilante Roger Barnett [was ordered] to pay $98,750 to a family of Mexican-Americans he terrorized in 2004.” This was a previous case against the rancher. 

Arizona Law does allow for physical and/or deadly force to prevent the commission of certain serious crimes:

“and also allows for a person to use physical force against another when and to the extent that a “reasonable person” would believe it necessary to prevent criminal trespass on their premises, or to prevent theft or criminal damage to certain property. Barnett has complained for years about illegal immigrants vandalizing his property, saying they “tore up water pumps, killed calves, destroyed fences and gates, stole trucks and broke into his home.”

The Arizona Rancher, Roger Barnett claimed he has turned over “12,000 illegal immigrants to the Border Patrol since 1998, has been sued by sixteen illegal immigrants he detained, allegedly at gunpoint, on his ranch.” 

After the ruling that the lawsuit could go forward, Roll received over 200 calls in one afternoon and was allegedly threatened by listeners of conservative radio hosts and others. US Marshal David Gonzales claimed the people making the threats were saying, “We should kill him, he should be dead.”

Roll and his wife were given 24-hour protection for about a month with the US Marshals guarding his home, screening his mail, escorting him back and forth from court, the gym, and even mass. Roll told the Arizona Republic, “It was unnerving and very invasive.” Eventually, four men were identified as the threat makers and the Marshals Service recommended he not press charges. Why would the Marshals recommend not to press charges? 

Max Blumenthal, an investigative journalist who was following the death threat case, was called as a witness by MALDEF to testify against Barnett in Roll’s courtroom. Here is his account of part of the trial. 

Regarding threats against Judge John Roll… even this comment appeared in his obituary:

“Apparently you weren’t aware that Rolls allowed a $32 million civil rights lawsuit between some illegals and an Arizona rancher whos property they were using to enter the US illegally to proceed. It looks to me as thought the good judge was more interested in protecting illegal sp*cks then he was the American people. Now he’s dead, he’s going to stay dead and he’s not going to roll over for the illegals anymore. I think this country just became a much better place to live.” 

While in Tucson investigating undercover, I visited Judge John Roll’s grave. I knew I was being watched and followed. I spoke to a grounds-keeper there. He stated, “there were over 400 federal agents and law enforcement at Roll’s funeral. They were in trees, on top of buildings, and surrounded the cemetery, they were everywhere.” 

The Forfeiture Act & Ruling Against the Obama Administration 

Case of Interest #4 – After the shooting, a report was circulating claiming,

“an unverified Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report was circulating in the Kremlin states that the top US Federal Judge for the State of Arizona was assassinated barely 72-hours after he made a critical ruling against the Obama administrations plan to begin the confiscation of their citizen’s private retirement and banking accounts in order to stave off their nations imminent economic collapse, and after having the US Marshals protecting him removed.”

According to this SVR report,

“Federal Judge John McCarthy Roll was the Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Arizona who this past Friday issued what is called a “preliminary ruling” in a case titled “United States of America v. $333,520.00 in United States Currency et al [Case Number: 4:2010cv00703 Filed: November 30, 2010], wherein he stated he was preparing to rule against Obama’s power to seize American citizens money without clear and convincing evidence of a crime being committed.”

This case was filed on November 30, just over a month prior to his death. Could the judge have been murdered because he was ruling against the Obama administration? I questioned the reports authenticity and credibility so I began to research for myself what this case was about. The internet forums began exploding with chatter that this was the real reason Roll was assassinated. 

Following the shooting, A. True Ott published an article called, Judge Roll Murder Motive, You Decide, on his blog, The Story Behind the Story, and claims, “I personally believe he was monitored, stalked and then shot and killed by a Manchurian Candidate programmed killer named Jared Lee Loughner.”

Ott also claimed in the article,

“Fact #1: Before being appointed the Chief Federal Judge of Arizona by President Bush, Judge Roll, in his position as a State Judge, was accused of being complicit in the machinations of a massive child abduction ring operation in Arizona with ALL of the earmarks outlined by attorney John W. DeCamp in his seminal book: The Franklin Cover-up – Child Abuse, Satanism, and Murder in Nebraska.” “Over 2500 missing children were involved in this scandal in Arizona, and Judge Roll was, according to a witness, deeply in the loop of this heinous activity.”

Ott also claims in his article,

“Fact #2: An integral piece of this scandal involved Mexican Drug Cartel money being laundered through American bank accounts. Judge Roll had in fact authorized the seizure of hundreds of millions of drug cartel funds and was openly defying U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s demands to release the money to federal control (which I submit would then find its way quickly back into its original Organized Crime accounts.) Roll refused to do follow Holder’s demands, and on Friday, January 7, (the day before his PLANNED ASSASSINATION) he issued a ruling that seized drug money would remain in State of Arizona control.” Ott then linked the money laundering process to the Zions Bank through an article by the Salt Lake Tribune titled; Feds slap Zions over billions in illegal money transfers, written by Paul Beebe. The article claims, “Two federal agencies have slapped Zions Bank with multimillion-dollar civil penalties for failing to monitor suspicious wire transfers of billions of dollars related to transactions that may have involved drug trafficking and other crimes.”

(Note: I will discuss Fact #1 in a later section in more detail.)

I wasn’t sure what to believe at the time because behind the scenes, A. True Ott has been defending himself as he was publicly accused of making death threats and allegedly having a ‘personal’ hand in the Loughner shooting. These accusations were made by investigative journalist Sherri Kane and Dr. Leonard Horowitz, owner of HealthyWorldStore.com. I will discuss more in detail in a later section. 

Some researchers believed the foreign intelligence report (SVR) from the Kremlin States, was a handy piece of disinformation purposely placed to infiltrate the political debates at the time of Roll’s murder. Was it really disinformation?

My research shows through a docket and PACER search, the case titled: United States of America v. $333,520.00 in United States Currency et al [Case Number: 4:2010cv00703 Filed: November 30, 2010], was really, [USA v. Garcia-Ramos], and it started with a young man, age 20, who was arrested for trying to smuggle money out of the U.S. back to Mexico.

According to the court documents, 

Misael Sadrak Garcia-Ramos was arrested at the DeConcini Port of Entry in Nogales, AZ on April 13, 2010, driving a 2007 Saturn Aura XE that was registered to him. When asked by a U.S. Customs officer if he had currency or monetary instruments to report, he declared he had less than $100. Garcia-Ramos was then escorted to a secondary area for an inspection. A K910B ‘Buster’ density meter delivered a 65-70 reading. The officers then searched the car and found $333,520 in U.S. Currency that was wrapped in brick-like packages with green cellophane wrapping. They were all marked with different names. Garcia-Ramos was charged with felony bulk cash smuggling charges and failure to report monetary instruments.

Garcia-Ramos pleaded not guilty and the trial took place in November 2010, before Judge Raner C. Collins. He was acquitted of all charges by a jury and a JUDGEMENT OF ACQUITTAL was filed and signed by Judge Raner C. Collins on November 05, 2010.

Following the trial, Dennis Burke, U.S. Attorney, and Reese Bostwick, Asst U.S. Attorney, for the UNITED STATES [plaintiff] filed a civil action titled, STIPULATED COMPLAINT FORFEITURE IN REM, against the property confiscated during the arrest in the United States District Court, District of Arizona on November 30, 2010. The Plaintiff prayed to the court,

“that due process issue to enforce the forfeiture of the $328,520 in United States currency, and the 2007 Saturn Aura XE, VIN 1G8ZS57N97F136757; that due notice be given to all parties to appear and show cause why the forfeiture should not be decreed; and prays that the $328,520 in United States currency, and the 2007 Saturn Aura XE, VIN… be condemned and forfeited to the United States of America, and delivered to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for disposition according to the law; and that the United States of America be granted such other relief as this court may deem just and proper, together with the costs and disbursements of this action.”

The plaintiff also claimed,

“7. That the United States and Claimant, Misael Sadrak Garcia-Ramos, have reached an agreement. The terms of the agreement are embodied in a STIPULATION OF FOREITURE. Pursuant to the terms of that agreement, the parties have agreed to the forfeiture of $328,520 in United States Currency, and a 2007 Saturn Aura XE, VIN…, described herein, after the appropriate procedural steps are taken. The government agrees to return $5,000 in United States currency, in lieu of the 2007 Saturn Aura Xe VIN…, to Claimant Misael Sadrak Garcia-Ramos.”

Judge John Roll was then assigned to the case on November 30th and the case number was changed to 4:10-CV-703-TUC-JMR. On December 01, 2010, a SCHEDULING ORDER was entered and signed by Judge John Roll. He ORDERED the parties and instructed them that they have 6 months to complete a discovery and the depositive motions must be filed within 7 months. It also stated,

“if this matter is stayed pending related criminal proceedings, a written joint status report shall be due every 6 months from the filing of an Order to stay the case.”

On December 02, 2011, a WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM, was signed by Deputy Clerk of Richard Weare, Clerk, to Customs and Border Protection, ordering that they detach and detain the defendants property into their custody until further ordered by the court.

The PROCESS RECEIPT AND RETURN, filed by the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) said in the comments section, “Warrant of Arrest placed in seizure file. Funds are currently deposited in supreme account.”

The US Customs and Border Protection is a division that was under Janet Napolitano (at the time) from the Department of Homeland Security. David Aguilar was the Deputy Commissioner. He was appointed as the ‘highest ranking’ official. Prior to his employment at CBP, he was a chief patrol agent in the Tucson sector and had more than 2,000 agents under his command. In 2003, the Tucson sector earned the CBP award for anti-terrorism under Operation Safeguard, which was an operation that took place in Tucson that planned, designated, and implemented ‘high-risk’ areas. It was in 2004 that the Department of Homeland Security designated Aguilar as Border and Transportation Security to execute the Arizona Border Control Initiative.

A ‘Declaration of Publication’ was then filed on the same day giving Notice of Civil Forfeiture. Following the WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM, filed for the assets to be seized, Judge John Roll was shot by the lone gunman and the case was transferred over to Judge Raner C. Collins.

Just a few weeks after Roll was allegedly gunned down at Safeway, United States Attorney, Dennis Burke filed a STIPULATION FOR FORFEITURE APPLICATION FOR CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE, where Garcia-Ramos agreed to stipulate to a forfeiture seizure, which would return to him $5000 as the United States would receive the remaining balance of seized money of $328.520. The final ruling of the STIPULATED JUDGEMENT FOR FORFEITURE CERTIFICATE OF REASONABLE CAUSE, signed by Judge Raner Collins allowed the agreement to be final.

Some additional cases Roll was presiding over include: Robinson-Burke et al v. GE Money Bank/Mers ,2008 Elections, Obama, Raytheon, Bank of America, Apache Nitrogen, American Fidelity, Global Aircraft, BCI Aircraft Leasing, Technosoft, Sockwise, 2XU Pty, Supplement Testing Institute, Natural Medical Solutions, Center for Biological Diversity, Farwest Development and Construction of SW, CMEC inc, Dept. of Ag, Pima Community College, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Fannie Mae, EMC, Suntrust, City of Tucson, Pima County, IRS, and Safeway, Inc, which included employee benefits.

Summary:

There were hundreds of cases before Judge Roll at the time of his murder. Some will argue he was just at the wrong place at the wrong time when he was shot by Loughner – case closed. However, growing evidence over the years have lead me to believe he was targeted for Assassination. This is not a closed case. There is a patsy serving a 7-Life Sentence for a crime I believe he did not commit – or knowingly commit. It may be closed in the courts ruling, but the nation still has not been told the truth, nor has the nation ever been shown real footage of Jared Lee Loughner. As of 2020, had been dieseled to Rochester, MN. 

Judge Roll’s Autopsy: https://jaredleeloughner.com/autopsy-reports/

Also Read:

Chapter 5: Assassinated Judge: Fast & Furious, Immigration, Burke, Obama, DHS, Weapons

#5G Jack Mullen Talks About EMF Damage and Mitigation with Body Align Owner and Products Inventor Steve Lepkowski